Biographical writing often tells us as much about the writer as about the subject. The title of Phehello J. Mofokeng’s A Note To Taiwa: a reflective essay on the music of Moses Molelekwa https://gekopublishing.co.za/bookstore/books/a-note-to-taiwa-reflective-essay-on-the-music-of-moses-molelekwa/, published late last year, acknowledges that upfront. It’s not an attempt at the chronological documentation of a life; rather, it’s Mofokeng’s very personal set of improvisations on Molelekwa’s work (particularly the tracks of the debut album, Finding One’s Self), journeying outwards to selected aspects of the pianist’s life story and circling back again to the core ideas enacted and represented by the sounds.
That kind of writing about music has been embraced by several South African writers – we can recall, for example, Percy Mabandu’s monograph on Yakhal’Inkomo, (currently hard to find, and shamefully not yet picked up by any publisher). Many, including Mabandu, acknowledge the influence of Geoff Dyer’s But Beautiful: a set of highly personal essays on American jazzmen by the English writer. So gorgeous was Dyer’s way with words that those seduced by how But Beautiful was written seemed to pay less attention to what the Englishman wrote. Apply a different eye and Dyer’s book emerges as fan-boy writing – though of the highest literary order: unreflectively masculinist, assuming from the outside familiarity with lives Dyer could never know; near to exoticising desperation-fuelled self-destruction. When his demi-gods did not deliver what he wanted, he turned on them: as evidenced by his petty, patronising whine about John Coltrane’s magnificent Offering: Live at Temple University, headlined Catastrophic Coltrane in the October 4 2014 issue of the New York Review of Books.
Though they may have read him, Mabandu and Mofokeng are not Dyer, and that is a strength for both. They have learned their subjects’ communities of origin from the inside; they know and respect the relevant intellectual traditions; they have consulted elders who share that cultural landscape. Dyer’s work certainly did contribute something to younger writers in his implicit invitation to write beautifully, apply adventurous writing techniques and an unashamed personal voice to the writing of life and to reject Bourdieu’s “biographical illusion” and, rather than straightening out events into a neat, unidirectional, tightly-referenced line of facts, to write the messy, simultaneous, recursive and multilayered nature of actual human living.
That embrace of a life as a mesh of interconnections, harmonies and resonances infuses Mofokeng’s work, creating acutely perceptive writing . His analysis of Molelekwa’s involvement in kwaito are the strongest I’ve seen, rooting both in the pianist’s commitment to making the music of the people. With a neat turn of phrase, he observes that South Africa is “sitting in the lap of jazz, mostly unaware of the importance of jazz as the foundation” of modern pop musics. What also shines through is Mofokeng’s love and respect for the young pianist and his music, expressed with moving lyricism. The “elastic memory of music, beats and sounds,” he says “connects us through a thread of sonic sorrow, happiness, angst, ecstacy and purpose.” Nor does Mofokeng shy away from the role and fate of Molelekwa’s wife, Flo Mtoba, and the prevailing, deeply gendered, silence around that.
Despite the title’s implicit declaration that (although it is certainly writing about a life) it is not a biography, the book will probably still be grabbed from the shelves by readers hungry for the detailed, straightforward, cradle-to-grave story. After all, there’s very little else: a situation tragically normal for most of our music greats. Those seeking that may be disappointed. Not only is Mofokeng’s highly personal reflection interwoven with much high-level music theory – Adorno, Bebey and more – but there’s hardly a date to be found. If it’s that kind of biography you’re looking for, you may have to write it.
The things the book is not matter very little. What matters is what it is. Even if you’re looking for the other kind, you’ll emerge enriched from reading this not-biography. Because Mofokeng has shaped a reading of Molelekwa that captures the pianist’s family legacy, emotions and visions and weaves those together with the spirit not just “of Tembisa”, but of Africa. That work lays a superb foundation for any future biographical project. It dares future biographers to look outwards from facts and chronologies to what those mean for society and humanity: it dares them to do what Molelekwa did and Mofokeng has done, and also dream.