We talk a great deal about the snags musicians encounter trying to earn a living online. What’s discussed less is the equally tough world of online music writing. Look closely, and you’ll see the same issues, the same patterns – and the same tendency for music writers on the periphery of the global industry (for example, in Africa) to fare worst of all. This very comprehensive report – some of whose writing team are South African – spells it out: https://geonet.oii.ox.ac.uk/blog/new-report-the-risks-and-rewards-of-online-gig-work-at-the-global-margins/
UPDATE: See also this Africa-specific study: https://theconversation.com/for-workers-in-africa-the-digital-economy-isnt-all-its-made-out-to-be-176724
The LinkedIn algorithm sent me a vacancy ad the other day for what it described as ‘online music journalism’. It made horrifying reading. But let’s be clear, that ad and that platform represent a global trend – they’re by no means the worst out there. I know people who’ve written for them, and at least they keep their promise and do pay the advertised rate.
For me and most music journalists I know, writing one decent music story demands at least a week’s work. You listen to the music, usually several times. You research the artist, the project, the background and context. You interview at least the performer and often other role-players too. You think, plan, draft and re-draft the text, shaping the information to suit your platform’s style and the needs of its readers.
You could do less – but the story would get progressively worse with every nip and tuck.
So what was the job this ad described?
You’d be writing “8 articles a day (a mix of original, exclusive and rewritten/aggregated news” You’d also be sourcing all the images and multimedia for those articles (in newsrooms, the responsibility of a production staffer), and doing the accompanying Facebook social media.
That’s 240 articles every month. Your fee would be between $450 -$650 per month. Correct me if my maths are inexact, but assuming a 30-day month that’s below three dollars (ZAR48 a story).
In order to qualify for this payment, you need a formal journalism qualification, experience, industry contacts, “a good laptop/PC” and a “stable reliable internet connection…Cellphone data is not acceptable”.
(That last provision, of course, excludes most township-based community journalists, who already do brilliant work tracking and documenting majority activities on their cellphones – and who are probably the most financially in need of this kind of work.)
To achieve that target of 8 stories a day, most of them can’t be original journalism. (Not to mention when do such writers get to sleep or eat properly? https://time.com/4972787/death-overwork-japan-heart-stress/ ) They’ll be “rewritten/aggregated news”. In other words, picking up whatever is already out there and cobbling it together in a slightly different form.
If you’ve ever wondered why so much online music content is just a set of refracting mirrors of itself, cravenly throwing back at us Western cultural hegemony, individualism and obsession with showbiz trivia and ‘personalities’, that’s why.
As we’ve noted before, if you throw nothing but that stuff at readers, they – and many non-specialist editors – will assume that’s all there is and that it defines the genre of music journalism. You can only select differently if you know about other choices.
Because content-creation is atomized: each person sitting at home in direct contact only with the boss, there’s no opportunity for peer learning (one huge potential strength of newsrooms, though not always built on) or for peer organization to demand better terms and conditions of work. You’re doing two people’s jobs, so somebody else doesn’t have one. And there’s no time to look outside the battery cage at the other kinds of writing that are possible.
I can’t say: don’t take jobs like this. Everybody needs to eat. Doing such work will definitely teach you something: how to conform to iron work discipline, how to research fast (but not necessarily deeply) and how to write fast (but not necessarily well). I can’t even say don’t read it, because, like all that fatally fatty, sugary, salty fast food, it is precisely tailored to the dopamine-triggering consumption patterns the Godzilla global online platforms are panel-beating us into.
But I can say: there are other choices.
In South Africa, the Mail & Guardian, New Frame, the Conversation and the wonderful Herri https://theconversation.com/review-herri-is-a-rare-new-arts-and-culture-journal-from-south-africa-137805 all offer real music stories that didn’t have to be written and posted in an hour. (Disclosure: I do write for some of these platforms. The above is why.) Internationally, Pitchfork, NPR, Afropop Worldwide, Africa is a Country and several more also offer thoughtful music writing, depending on your genre preferences.
And as Uber and Lyft drivers have demonstrated, being forced to operate alone doesn’t stop you trying to organize with fellow-workers so you can at least get your treadmill running more gently. Don’t think, because you can call yourself ‘a writer’, that your situation isn’t just like theirs. Investors in the various gig economy enterprises aren’t there to make immediate profits (Uber hadn’t made a profit in 10 years until the peculiar pandemic circumstances of 2021.) They are investing in the future profit potential that will only come from destroying national industries and real jobs https://newsocialist.org.uk/the-gig-economy/ and replacing them with atomized, un-organised workers completely at their mercy.
Alongside the shoddy re-treaded music writing this business model foists on writers and readers, that’s one more reason to resist.